About Me

Name: Icarus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Just how big is this conspiracy?


America's Domestic Terrorists must love Google and the New York Times

Democrat Times of New York is finally covering Sen. Obama's relationship with unrepentant domestic terrorist Bill Ayers. I hope your news spread with a healthy dose of whitewash and cover-up.

National Review's Stanley Kurtz comments on the Times' coverage. I was interested in this bit:
As others have noted, today’s New York Times carries a story on the relationship between Barack Obama and unrepentant Weather Underground terrorist, Bill Ayers. ... The title of the article when it first appeared on the web last night was, "Obama Had Met Ayers, but the Two Are Not Close." That was quickly changed to, "Obama and the ‘60's Bomber: A Look Into Crossed Paths." (emphasis added)
The first thing I did was Google the article's original title. The results were exactly two hits; one was the Kurtz write up at NRO, the other was a 'daily digest' that referenced the Kurtz article. A search through Google News offers up no hits whatsoever. But what about those "catched" web pages? The one's that go missing that we're able to see thanks to this great new technology? How come the original webpage that had the original story didn't show up as a "catched" page?

So what does Google mean by "catched"? According to the well known internet search engine:
Google takes a snapshot of each page examined as it crawls the web and caches these as a back-up in case the original page is unavailable. If you click on the "Cached" link, you will see the web page as it looked when we indexed it. The cached content is the content Google uses to judge whether this page is a relevant match for your query.
This explanation, however, seems to be inaccurate. Google does not take a snapshot of "each page ... as it crawls the web". It appears as if it takes a snapshot of only some pages. A search for the exact phrase "Obama had met Ayers" comes up with only six results; 15 if you include those Google hides because they are deamed "similar" to those already shown. It should be noted that the Kurtz's piece at NRO is one of the items hidden from view in the original search. Note that not all the pages found by Google have been "catched". Those not "catched" include FreeRepublic.com, BlogsForJohnMcCain.com and Corner.NationalReview.com. The DemocraticUnderground.com and the website for left-wing talk radio host Taylor Marsh, titled, cleverly enough, TaylorMarsh.com.

This brings up a lot of questions. How do some pages get catched and some do not? Could that original article title have been catched? If so and it was not, why not?

Google is a well known supporter of the Obama campaign. It is one thing for the Main Stream Media to not report a story. Alternatives on the internet stand a good chance of picking it up. The Dan Rather, forged documents incident is a perfect example of this. It is something else entirely if a well known internet search engine were working hand in hand with a biased news source to actively remove stories from the internet.

The explanation could be entirely innocuous. On the on the hand, someone's ideology may be playing a role as well. If it is the latter then this gives the phrase "down the memory hole" a whole new, 21st Century meaning.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Google - just another part of the Obama Propaganda Machine

There wasn't much sleep last night after getting some mixed news on the job front. I dragged myself out of bed at 6:30 this morning and spent a few moments listening to the YouTube clips of Ezra Levants interrogation by the Canadian Liberal Fascists Committee "Human Rights Commission". Recall how meticulously German National Socialists were in documenting and recording everything they did, in contrast to Soviet Communists. Films and records can be found for just about anything that occured in Germany during that little mustached fellow's rise  to and abuse of power. The Canadian government seems to be following the same track of meticulously recording every abuse of human rights it engages in. Case in point (an aside watch the female commissar's commissioner's reactions during Mr. Levant's opening statement - also be sure to watch the other clips from the interrogation, it is quite an educational experience):



The real purpose of this post is to point out what I saw on my iGoogle homepage this morning. Here is a screen shot:



After reading that justice has finally been done and OJ Simpson was finally found guilty (unfortunately it wasn't for the slaughtering his ex-wife and her friend and he may only serve as little as 7 years, less if they include time already served), I noticed a link to the New York Times, titled "The Joe Biden Show", in iGoogle "Top Stories" box in the lower left hand corner. Here's the detail:


I clicked it just to see what this "news story" was about. In point of fact, it isn't a new story at all. It is an Opinion piece by Charles M. Blow. Let's take a look at what someone at Google considers to be news:
"I expected Sarah Palin to perform well in Thursday’s debate, so I wanted to watch it with the most conservative crowd I could find. (In truth, after her horrendous performance with Katie Couric, anything short of her head spinning around and spewing vomit would have been considered an improvement.)"
I'm sure he "expected" her to perform well. The Exorcist reference makes his open-minded-ness on this debate perfectly clear. He goes on with:
"I went to the unlikely Jake’s Saloon in Chelsea in Manhattan where the New York Young Republican Club was gathering to watch (on Fox)."
"Unlikely"? Why? I know trying to find a conservative establishment in Manhattan is like to trying to find a free speech advocate on a Canadian Human Rights Commission, but what exactly made it "unlikely"? Was it the fact that it actually let Republicans in? Or was it that it had Fox News on its TVs? Come on, Mr. Blow. Inquiring minds want to know.
"Palin launched into her charm offensive — winking, smiling, dodging questions and speaking in her signature Sarah-phonics , a mash up of sentence fragments and colloquialisms glued together with misplaced also’s and there’s — gibberish really. Everyone in the bar lapped it up. It was The Sarah Palin Show."
Nice to see what, exactly, Mr. Blow was expecting when he entered Chelsea's: "gibberish really".
"As it became clear that she wasn’t going to implode, I started to see the debate instead as The Joe Biden Show. And, it was good.
Through the booing and hissing, I saw a strong, authoritative, confident and sensitive candidate emerge. On the whole, he came across as intelligent and relatable; a real person. That’s a quality that often eludes Barack Obama."
And who, again, is at the top of the Democrat ticket? Ah, yes, a guy who "often" is not "intelligent and relatable, a real person". Good to know that Democrats have their priorities straight.
"In a recent New York Times/CBS News poll, 32 percent of Democrats, 38 percent of independents and 41 percent of Republicans said they didn’t know or had no answer when asked to say what they most liked about Biden."
You don't suppose, Mr. Blow, that those numbers could result from the fact that there isn't much to like about Senator-for-life Biden? Naah.

The real purpose of this post is to show what some liberals at Google consider news. I wonder if I'll ever see this linked in the "Top Stories" section of my iGoogle home page: "A Conservative Revival?" Let's just say, I'm not holding my breath.

UPDATE:
A few moments after I got the screenshot of the Democrat Times of New York Op-Ed appearing in Google's Top Stories section, someone at Google changed it. This is what it looked like not less the 30 minutes after I got the images above:


I didn't check the McCain - Obama story to see if it was legit news. The fact that's linked to the Democrat Times of Los Angeles tells me that even if it is not another Op-Ed, it will be just as biased against the Republican nominee.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Neil Gaiman's "The Graveyard Book"


Chapter One

This is why I love Neil Gaiman's work.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Preoccupation with the Feelies meets the Cult of Personality



When the cops kick in your door and drag you to jail for not paying taxes, tell me it's only opinion. When the government shuts down the radio and television station you have watched or listened to devotedly for the past few years, tell me it's just view as good as any other. When a teacher tells parents that they have no say how their children are taught and the government mandates sex education for 5 year old toddlers, tell me it is just one person's belief, no different than any other. When Islamic theocracies stone rape victims to death, ignore ‘honor killings’, and execute apostates tell me ... that conversation on politics and religion is just one opinion arguing with another, and this one is no different and no better than that one.

The morning before an extremely Vice Presidential debate in an extremely close Presidential contest, I only heard, “I refuse to talk about: Religion and Politics. It’s all just opinion. Everyone has their own opinion.” I have been wondering these past days and weeks how we got to where we are today. A Left-wing radical stands on the cusp of becoming the 44th President of the United States. The Federal Government is about to eat up a significant portion of private property mortgages. Radical Islamists are at war with Western Civilization and work furiously to establish Islamic Sha’ria religious law in Europe and America. And my fellow citizens, based on the circle of folks around me, are more interested in Monday Night Football, American Idol and whether or not Lindsay Lohan will make it through rehab.

My ‘apolitical co-worker’, dismissed both politics and religion with an “everyone has their own opinion” disdain masked with a smile and laugh. Why has something that impacts everyone’s life everyday become off limits as a topic of conversation? When did it become vogue to dismiss law, regulation and taxation as mere opinion no different from what’s your favorite color or what should we eat tonight, Italian or Chinese?

The blame has to lie with the Left and the absurd idea that “all politics is personal”, reinforced by a media and educational system that has enshrined feelings as the touchstone for political and cultural attitudes and opinion. As more and more Americans watch Oprah, The View and other trash TV shows like this, the more our politics will devolve to sharing what we feel about issues. Reason and rational thought are tossed on the trash heap of history, and whoever gets the most sympathy or yells the loudest usually wins.

As Neil Postman wrote in his Foreward to Amusing Ourselves to Death Aldous Huxley saw this coming a long time ago. “Huxley feared those who would give us so much that we would be reduced to passivity and egoism. … Huxley feared we would become a trivial culture, preoccupied with some equivalent of the feelies, the orgy porgy, and the centrifugal bumblepuppy. As Huxley remarked in Brave New World Revisited, the civil libertarians and rationalists who are ever on the alert to oppose tyranny "failed to take into account man's almost infinite appetite for distractions".”

My co-workers would rather discuss the latest college football match than who may be the leader of the free world. The result of this could be a repeat of 20th Century’s worse years. What happens to a nation when the people are preoccupied with the feelies at the same time a cult of personality entices them with goodies?

We might find out should Obama win in November.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Pro-Obama Pre-Crime Truth Squads



Obama activists in the United States Justice Department seem to have created a Pre-Crime Unit that focuses on Civil Rights violations. Or at least Civil Rights violations engaged in by Republicans.
"There is a troubling report that the Justice Department’s Civil Rights Section, top officials of which are Obama contributors, has suggested criminal prosecutions against those they anticipate will engage in voter “intimidation” or “oppression” in an election involving a black candidate."
What once was science fiction now seems to be fact. Of course, Obama's supporters don't need psychics to tell them who the racists are. All they need are good vision and voter registration records - if you're a white male voting Republican then you're presumed racist until you prove otherwise.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I do not like Bill O'Reilly


Bill O'Reilly has a huge fan base. He beats most other cable news talk shows in viewership. I think he is just another member of the media elite herd.

I heard him on Mike Gallagher's show this morning talking about Sen. B.H. Obama. Two things jumped out at me.

First, Gallagher asks Bill if he thinks Obama is a Leftist. O'Reilly responds with "I don't know." Whaa?!? Obama's career in government was launched in the home of a man who bombed the Pentagon and complained that that wasn't enough, and who was recently photographed stomping an American flag into the ground. Obama was the only Illinois State Senator who voted to ensure that infants born alive after a botched abortion were left to die. Obama has the most liberal voting record in the US Senate. And there is much, much more. But O'Reilly doesn't know if Obama is a Leftist? What would it take, a photograph of Obama standing arm in arm with Hugo Chavez, denouncing American "imperialism"

Second, O'Reilly believes that the Main Stream Media "is not in the tank for Obama." They are only about 80-20 for Obama. Meanwhile, it is noted today that one of the VP debate moderators, Gwen Ifill, stands to make a healthy profit if Obama becomes the 44th POTUS.

And then there is this bit of whistle blowing that it making its way round the blogosphere:
AN INSTAPUNDIT READER AT A MAJOR NEWSROOM EMAILS: "Off the record, every suspicion you have about MSM being in the tank for O is true. We have a team of 4 people going thru dumpsters in Alaska and 4 in arizona. Not a single one looking into Acorn, Ayers or Freddiemae. Editor refuses to publish anything that would jeopardize election for O, and betting you dollars to donuts same is true at NYT, others. People cheer when CNN or NBC run another Palin-mocking but raising any reasonable inquiry into obama is derided or flat out ignored. The fix is in, and its working."
But O'Reilly doesn't think the media is in the tank for the Obama-Biden ticket?!?

I really don't like Bill O'Reilly.


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

"We're gonna change em..."?!?



If these Obamunists and their offspring think they're gonna "change" me and "rearrange" me, then they have another thing coming.

And where, exactly, is this "changing" and "rearranging" going to take place? Hmmm?!?

Liberal Fascism indeed.

If people are so dense, and this does not start to sink the Obamessiah's campaign, then I don't know what will.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The $700 Billion Dollar Pricetag? The Feds made it up.



According to Forbes, a Treasury Department Spokeswoman has declared that the $700 Billion dollar figure that's been attached to the current crisis ... well, they just made it up. They have no idea what the pricetag should be.

And EVEYRONE in the media, and I mean everyone - talk radio, newspapers, network and cable television - is using it to scare the beejeesus out of the masses.

Listening to Hugh Hewitt's broadcast from Monday, 9/29, was like listening to a replay of the Hindenberg disaster but with anger replacing grief. At one point he said the market closed more then 700 points down. That was a lie. At one point the market was down over 700 points, but it closed about 570 points down. Furthermore, when a female caller asks him where the $700 billion figure came from he responded with "What happens if [your huband] loses his job?" and "It's like if you have cancer and you refuse chemotherapy. You're going to die!"

And what does the Dow Jones do after yesterday's "distaster"?


Something about all this just doesn' t sit right with me. And a lot of that has to do with the panic the media is fostering.

HT: to JohnFN at threedonia.com, via LGF, via LATimes.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

I'm really looking forward to An American Carol

I am praying so hard that An American Carol is very, very funny. I really need to laugh, and I'm afraid that this may be our last hope for McCain - Palin victory in November. It certainly seems like McCain doesn't want to do the hard work to win this thing.



Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Sheriffs and Prosecutors threaten ads on behalf of Obama

I would not be surprised to see this front page, above the fold in the New York Times, and it would play a significant role in the Sunday morning news talk shows, if it concerned Sen. John McCain. Instead some major political campaign news is ignored because it focuses an unflattering light on Sen. B.H. Obama.

Only a few folks in Missouri and those listening to talk radio or browsing the internet will learn the Obama campaign is using police and prosecutors to threaten American citizens who criticize Obama.

As a commenter at The Volokh Conspiracy alluded, imagine if the threats were coming from the United States Justice Department led by Pres. Obama.

Here's what all the threats are about.


I'm beginning to think, if Obama wins in November we should be very afraid of those standing on the Thin Blue Line, especially when they become a force for oppression.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Democrats forgot Republicans

If you going to hold a "bipartisan" meeting, you might want to think about inviting the other party! Apparently this kind of common sense is lost on Democrat politicians.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

How did we get here?

When the economic crisis started hitting the airwaves Democrats pointed fingers at Ronald Reagan, Republican deregulation and Pres. Bush. Then people started to look at the recent past. Suddenly Democrats changed their tune. "Looking at the past, won't fix things today," many say before a sycophantic media.

Why wouldn't Democrats want folks to look at the past? What's behind the curtain the Dems don't want you to see? This video contains some answers:


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Liberty Film Festival, Where art thou?



Libertas has been on "summer hiatus" since July 9, 2008.

Either the site is done, or else it is going to be huge when it comes back online.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (1) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Please, try to defend this



How's this for get rich quick scheme (rather get richer scheme): Get hired by a company in order to turn around a failing company, "work" for three weeks, then, while flying cross country in first class, get fired AND collect almost $20 million when the company you were hired to save goes under. That, in a nutshell, is how the former Washington Mutual CEO cashed out on not doing his job.
"[Alan H.] Fishman, who formerly was chairman of Meridian Capital Group, apparently was much coveted by WaMu, which was counting on him to lead the failing thrift out of mortgage troubles that pushed the bank to a $3.3 billion second-quarter loss.

"According to filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, WaMu threw a $7.5 million bonus at Fishman when it hired him on Sept. 8, and guaranteed him an immediate cash severence of $11.6 million — both of which he gets to keep.

There are a lot of free market fundamentalists who will defend this. To them I would say, try this at your next job. Get hired to do something, don't do it, and then see how much money you can get when your employer hands you your walking papers. This is also why a lot of people will vote for the radical left-wing Obamessiah.

I will also be taking my money out of Washington Mutual and looking for another institution. Given that I haven't heard of any Credit Unions going under during this crisis, I will likely put my money in Navy Federal.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (3) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Ghost in the Gym



It just wanted to work out, and maybe was frustrated by its inability to move the weights.

You have to wonder what it is after watching the video. A motion sensitive camera comes on and the only thing that shows up is a moving cloud, drifting around the gym. It can't be a light from outside, because light won't cause the camera to come on. It can't be dust blown by the HVAC system, because it does not move in a regular pattern.

It seems to me that there is only one answer.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive