Posted by
Daniel Crandall on Saturday, November 24, 2007 6:24:42 PM
I just found the Fall 2007 issue of the Intercollegiate Review, published by the Intercollegiate Studies Institute. The opening editorial made an interesting point.
"... we have presumed a 'universal' history in which the West represents the vanguard of mankind, behind which all humanity will at length follow, so that all will inevitably become 'like us' - enlightened, largely secular, liberal democrats. We have not considered the possibility that 'modernization' may lead to quite different destinations. The Cold War struggle with Soviet communism was an ideological conflict precisely because both communism and Western liberal democracy laid claim to the status of the 'vanguard within the vanguard' in the West's universal history. The current interaction with a resurgent Islam [I would write Islamo-Nazism] in not an ideological conflict, however, precisely because Islam rejects the universality of the West's history.
"American conservatives have [at] hand a rich repertoire of arguments, concepts, and theories concerning ideological struggle, a legacy of our leadership role in the Cold War. We lack, however, similar resources for understanding a 'civilizational' conflict. We need new thinking for a new historical circumstance."
I think this is onto something. Mark C. Henrie, who penned the quote above, is accurately describing why conservatives are failing spark the majority of the population's imagination and failing to convey the threat the West currently faces.
Boris's comments (in my post about Horowitz) regarding "the Nation's main ideological problem" also fail to address this situation and only seems to propose the same solution as the Left. The Left would shut down anyone who doesn't meet some vague and always changing standard of "political correctness". Boris, as the conservative side to that same coin, seems to want to shut down anyone who fails to meet some vague standard of "responsible words leading to responsible action."
Furthermore, in response to Boris's comments linked above, being entitled to one's own opinion is not an "ideological problem". Being entitled to one's own "truth", however, is a very serious problem indeed.