About Me

Name: Icarus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

US military to dress as civilians, hide behind women & children, and fight from schools, churches & hospitals.

That is what you would think when you read this story's headline: "US Studies Hezbollah to Prepare Troops". Reading the article puts a very different spin on the story and should have led to a very different headline.

The story's third and fourth paragraphs give a much better picture than does the ignorant headline:
With the US military engaged in counter insurgency battles in Iraq and Afghanistan, concerns have been raised that it is no longer prepared to effectively fight enemies using conventional tactics.

To counter this, the newspaper reported, the US has sent more than a dozen teams to Israel to interview military officers who fought against Hezbollah in 2006 to glean as much information about their tactics as possible.

American Military leaders are not studying Hezbollah as much as they are studying Israeli tactics in that nation's fight against Hezbollah. This article's headline continues the fiction that Hezbollah was militarily successful in 2006. In fact, Hezbollah suffered major losses when Israel decided to fight back, and the only thing that kept Hezbollah vermin alive to fight another day was interference from Islamo-Nazi appeasing bureaucrats in Europe and the American State Department.

Of course, no headline writer, trained at an "elite" college or university journalism program, would have been caught dead writing more truthful headline such as, "US Studies Israeli Military to Prepare Troops".


Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

Media Bias all present & accounted for


Perfect acronym for MSM's comprehension of all things military
I  am not surprised by the Main Scream Media's antipathy toward the American military. By in large, reporters are products of their environment; indoctrinated educated by anti-military instructors, from Grade School to Graduate School, they carry an anti-military bias into the working world. I'm not surprised, but I am greatly dismayed.

A perfect example of a reporters anti-military bias is a Fox News story that greeted me when I opened my  internet home page this morning. The headline screamed "Ex-Husband: Army Said Pregnant Soldier Found Dead in Hotel Was AWOL". The story concerns the tragic case of an Army Spc. Megan Lynn Touma, who was discovered dead in a hotel room. The story's second and third paragraphs are completely groundless charges by the Specialist's ex-husband implicating the US Army in the death and in some kind of cover-up.
"She was left in the room for two days, and the Army said she was AWOL. They didn't even bother to go check on her in the motel where she stayed. I mean the Army knows that she stayed in that hotel," El Sayed Touma [the ex-husband] said."
Other than inflaming anti-military (and anti-American) emotion, what is the purpose of this quote? It adds nothing to the story. Any soldier that does not report when so ordered is noted in personnel records as "Absent Without Leave", or AWOL. Including in this report a quote from an ex-husband that implies the Army "left" Spc. Touma for two days is a mendacious lie. Reporting the soldier AWOL is standard procedure; it'd 'dog bites man' portion of this story. Including the ex-husbands quote, however, puts a very different spin on the events.

I'm very sorry that Spc. Touma's family lost a loved one. I'm also very sorry that Fox News has decided to turn the tragedy into an attack against the America's military. This is utterly disgraceful.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »