About Me

Name: Icarus
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Academics preceded Napolitano and DHS in pathologizing conservatism

What the Left sees when they imagine Conservatives. Is the short one John Adams?

I should not have been skeptical when I first heard about the DHS report on "Rightwing Extremism". Academics, after all, have been pathologizing conservatism for years. Now that Left-wing academics control the White House and Congress, it should be no surprise that government policy reflects the academic tendency to dismiss political opponents as mentally deranged and one small step from violence and mayhem.

A University of Manitoba associate professor created the "Right Wing Authoritarian" scale. "[R]ight-wing authoritarians are cognitively rigid, aggressive, and intolerant. They are characterized by steadfast conformity to group norms, submission to higher status individuals, and aggression toward out-groups and unconventional group members." I wonder how many conservatives have a watch file at DHS that notes their RWA score. Given Pope Benedict XVI's strong stance on abortion, his RWA score must be off the charts.

Not to be outdone, of course: "Researchers at the University of California at Berkeley ... linked to political conservatism [to] fear and aggression, dogmatism and intolerance of ambiguity, uncertainty avoidance, need for cognitive closure, and terror management that causes conservatives to shun and even punish outsiders and those who threaten the status of their cherished world views." So it's no wonder that conservative Americans is the only group in reference to which DHS Sec. Napolitano and White House Spokesman Nick Shapiro have both used the word terrorist and terrorism, respectively. Those "disaffected youths", who happen to be Islamic, in New York, England, France, Iraq, Iran, Turkey, Afghanistan, Pakistan, etc, ad nauseum, are merely experiencing "man caused disasters" (even if the perpetrator was a woman, because men are at the root of all violence, dontcha ya know).

Ronald Bailey, writing in the Reason article linked above, suggests that it may be just a matter of time before conservatism is listed in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. He writes, "Reasonable people, such as the distinguished academic researchers cited here, will no doubt agree that until effective treatments can be developed, we should reconsider whether sufferers of conservatism, like other mental defectives, should be allowed freely to exercise the franchise." The current Administration and the bureaucrats at the Department of Homeland Security seem to be considering Mr. Bailey's advice, at least to the extent that these "Rightwing Extremist" mental defectives should be monitored.
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

DHS "Rightwing Extremist" report - bogus? Nope. It's for Real.

Conservative websites are all abuzz about an alleged Department of Homeland Security report titled, "Rightwing Extremism: Current Economic and Political Climate Fueling Resurgence in Radicalization and Recruitment." Be skeptical about this report. Be very skeptical.

Here are some of the reasons why I think this report is bogus.

The first thing that struck me is that report is so short. It is only 10 pages long. Does anyone think the government can produce a report containing "Law Enforcment Sensivitive information" that is only going to be 10 pages long?

Note how "Key Findings" are nothing more than repeats of paragraphs from the text. Show me a report that is that straightforward and I'll show you a bureaucrat that doesn't know write in legalese.

Check out the emails at page 10, "for comments & questions" etc. The email address end with "@hq.dhs.gov", "@dhs.sgov.gov" [sgov? what, 'secret government'? Come on] "@dhs.ic.gov"?!? The DHS email address I've seen on that agency's website are nothing more than "@dhs.gov". I'd send a message to some of those so-called DHS email address in what looks very much like a bogus report, but I don't want the conspiracy nutter spam I think that will open me up to.

Here are some quotes that I would be surprised if they came from any government agency; anti-government nutters trying to scare people onto their side of the fence maybe, but not from the Department of Homeland Security.

Note on Page 2 of 9: “[Rightwing extremism] may include groups and individuals that are dedicated to a single issue, such as opposition to abortion or immigration.”

“The information is provided to federal, state, local, and tribal counterterrorism and law enforcement officials” Emphasis added. Tribal counterterrorism & law enforcement official?

"The economic downturn and the election of the first African American president present unique drivers for rightwing radicalization and recruitment.” This is the same canard a lot of liberal-left activists were putting out there in order to discredit any and all criticisms of Pres. Obama. I guess ACORN is now writing law enforcement reports for DHS?

The report includes reference to the Philadelphia shooting werein 3 of Philly's finest lost their lives. Do people really think a DHS report could be that timely, even one related to law enforcement?

I think some nutter saw this phrase that is on at the DHS website and ran with it: "[Office of Intelligence and Analysis] has five analytic thrusts aligned with the principal threats to the Homeland addressed by DHS. The first is threats related to border security. ... The second is the threat of radicalization and extremism. Our top priority is radicalized Islam (Sunni and Shia groups), but we also look at radicalized domestic groups. We do not monitor known extremists and their activities; instead, we are interested in the radicalization process - why and how people who are attracted to radical beliefs cross the line into violence." Emphasis in original.

I also think that this is being used to set the table for Left-wing infiltration of the Tax Day Tea Parties, in the sense that this will be used to get some conservatives so fired up that they start screaming nonsesne about the Obama administration and what it's doing vis a vis conservative protests. Look how this just happened to come out at the same time as Paul Krugman's dismissive attack on Republicans and the grassroots Tea Parties. Note that Krugman refers to "the G.O.P. looked as crazy 10 or 15 years ago as it does now." And also note that the "DHS report" makes several references to the 90s. What better way to make conservatives look crazy than to plant this nonsense in their brains days before what may be the largest spontaneous gethering of conservatives and others critical of the Big Government?

Do not buy into this stuff, people. The Left wants to discredit the Tea Party movement. Don't help them by buying into what I think is a bogus report.

UPDATE - I was wrong: I know how to admit a mistake, and it looks like I'm wrong. This report is a real DHS document. "The [DHS] press office got back to [Michelle Malkin] and verified that the document is indeed for real." Good God. How did federal government become so blatantly antagonistic; labeling people who do nothing more than question the growth of federal government as potential terrorists who need to be monitored? Where is the Obama Propaganda Machine Main Stream Media in ferreting out this blatant government attack on freedom of speech? What is going on in this country? I guess I should have known that the radical Leftists who produced this steaming pile of a report were actually federal government bureaucrats. This is just insane. I guess now, with posts like this, and many more, I'm probably on some DHS watch list. Is this why I'm having a hard time finding a job? Things that make you go ... Hmmmm ...
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »